AS FUNDER ← edit slice ·
the field for →

Youth Safety Screening & Training

01 Youth Safety Screening & Training · 59 edit slice
20
orgs
59
activities
8
strategies
AZ
epicenter
the opening take
This slice touches 20 organizations and 59 activities — Prescott YMCA of Yavapai County (0189), CYT PHOENIX, CACTUS FOOTHILLS LITTLE LEAGUE, BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COLORADO and others. Activity concentrates in Arizona (100%). The field's most common shared approach is "Development Through Inclusive Athletics", run by 9 orgs.
who to look at first

shortlist

Ranked by activity breadth, method diversity, and network reach across the slice. Attach a memo to this report and this list re-ranks around your intent.

where this slice is thin

gap signals

Concrete structural gaps — method mix, geographic concentration, coalition density, funder diversity. Evidence is cited from the slice's own numbers.

where the field lives · works

geography

Orange headquarters dots are sized by how many grantees are based in the state. Green circles mark real locations these orgs say they serve — from city-level populations in this slice's impact_map_populations data. Toggle layers at the bottom right.

regional breakdown · hq density
Arizona 100% · 20 orgs
who's here

organizations in this field · 20

sort by
direct service advocacy research capacity building
where the money comes from

funders already active in this field

Funders named as a funding source on these orgs' own materials. The count is the number of orgs in this slice that cite them — higher means a funder with demonstrable commitment to the field.

AmazonSmile 1
Corporate
Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) 1
Government
Box Tops for Education 1
Corporate
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) 1
Government
EPCOR 1
Corporate
Fiesta Bowl 1
Corporate
First Things First 1
Government
Fry's Community Rewards Program 1
Corporate
Giving Assistant 1
Corporate
H.U.D. 1
Government
HUD 1
Government
Jim Click Automotive 1
Corporate
Jim Click Automotive Group 1
Corporate
KABOOM! 1
Corporate
how the field thinks

strategies in this slice

Theories of action extracted from the orgs in this slice. The count is how many orgs cite each one — a strategy run by many orgs in common is a through-line; one cited by a single org is still surfaced so the reader can gauge the full spread.

where strategy meets practice

strategies × activity types

How each shared strategy breaks down across the four activity types the orgs running it actually do.

direct service
advocacy
research
capacity building
Development Through Inclusive Athletics
19
8
Faith-Integrated Formation
5
10
Holistic Youth Development
2
7
Culturally Grounded Development
3
Family-School-Community Partnership
1
Financial Accessibility as Inclusion
5
2
Person-Centered Holistic Care
4
Self-Sustaining Revenue via Thrift
1
who works with whom

named partnerships · coalitions · networks

Entities these orgs explicitly call out as partners, coalition members, or networks. Unlike the strategy-sharing graph below (which is inferred from shared approaches), these are relationships the orgs claim on their own sites.

Arizona Department of Public Safety Government
shared by 4 orgs
Arizona State University Partner
shared by 3 orgs
Arizona Cardinals Partner
shared by 2 orgs
Boys & Girls Clubs of America Network
shared by 2 orgs
First Tee Network
shared by 2 orgs
First Tee – Tucson Partner
shared by 2 orgs
Little League International Network
shared by 2 orgs
National Center for Missing & Exploited Children Partner
shared by 2 orgs
National Children’s Advocacy Center Partner
shared by 2 orgs
Praesidium Partner
shared by 2 orgs
1st Institutional Baptist Church Partner
shared by 1 org
26 Point 2 Designs Partner
shared by 1 org
520 Running and Riding Partner
shared by 1 org
99pledges.com Partner
shared by 1 org
ABLE Financial Group Partner
shared by 1 org
ALSAC/St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital Partner
shared by 1 org
where the field connects

strategy-sharing network

Inferred from shared theories of action: each line connects an org to a strategy it runs. Organizations that share many strategies cluster through the same nodes — funders can spot the field's structural bridges.

scale of the field

rollup metrics

Aggregated scale claims from orgs in the slice. Treat as a floor, not a ceiling — many orgs don't publish these numbers, so totals underrepresent real reach. Extreme outliers (often unit-mismatches upstream) are filtered out.

13K
People served
from 4 orgs
562
Partner organizations
from 4 orgs
340
Staff
from 3 orgs