AMERICAN FREEDOM LAW CENTER INC

Argues cases before appellate courts to advance pro-life speech and traditional family values, including a successful California appellate case invalidating a ban on "grisly and gruesome" imagery and litigation supporting religious and familial rights.

Engages in litigation to protect religious liberty and free speech, including securing rulings that local government restrictions on religious expression and speech (such as displaying religious structures or photographing children in public parks) violate constitutional rights. Represents clients in federal and state appellate courts, including the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the Supreme Court of Virginia.

Represents clients in state and federal courts to protect religious liberty and free speech, including challenges to government restrictions on religious expression and public speech. Achieved rulings such as the Sixth Circuit's affirmation allowing Catholic Healthcare International to hold religious gatherings and display religious structures, and a California appellate ruling striking down a ban on pro-life imagery.

Represents clients in First Amendment cases challenging government censorship or discriminatory speech policies, including litigation over park photography ordinances, election-related speech, and prosecution of political expression.

Files and argues lawsuits in federal and state courts to protect religious expression, including challenges to government restrictions on religious displays, speech, and gatherings, such as cases involving Catholic Healthcare International and religious advertisements on public transit.

Advances legal protections for pro-life speech and expression, including challenging bans on graphic imagery in public spaces and litigating cases tied to the moral and constitutional defense of human life.

Files federal civil rights lawsuits challenging government policies and prosecutions, including those related to election integrity, use of "hate group" designations to target conservative groups, and local zoning or law enforcement actions. Litigates cases involving constitutional challenges to state ballot initiatives and prosecutorial conduct.

Files lawsuits against government entities for allegedly using tools like the SPLC "hate group" list to discriminate against conservative organizations, and challenges prosecutions believed to be politically motivated, such as those against Andrew Hess and Trump electors.

Files civil rights lawsuits in federal courts across multiple jurisdictions challenging local government actions, including police conduct, zoning decisions, and prosecutions perceived as politically motivated.

Represents Trump electors in litigation arising from the 2020 presidential election, including defending against lawsuits filed by Biden electors and appealing adverse rulings in Michigan courts.

Represents Trump/Pence electors in a civil lawsuit filed by Biden/Harris electors in Michigan, including filing appellate briefs and motions to defend against claims and appeal adverse rulings.

Represents five of the sixteen Trump/Pence electors in a civil lawsuit filed by Biden/Harris electors in Michigan, including filing appellate briefs and motions to dismiss claims lacking legal merit.

Provides legal representation in child custody, adoption, and family rights cases, including securing a Supreme Court of Virginia ruling affirming the adoption of an Afghan child by a U.S. military-connected family.

Provides legal representation in high-profile adoption and custody cases with constitutional dimensions, including securing a Supreme Court of Virginia ruling in favor of Joshua and Stephanie Mast in their adoption of an Afghan orphan, and representing Richard Mast in related federal litigation.

Provides legal representation in child custody and adoption cases involving constitutional and military-related circumstances, including securing a Supreme Court of Virginia ruling affirming the adoption of an Afghan orphan by a U.S. military family.