AS FUNDER ← edit slice ·
the field for →

Raptor and Wildlife Education Programs

01 Raptor and Wildlife Education Programs · 31 edit slice
12
orgs
31
activities
6
strategies
AZ
epicenter
the opening take
This slice touches 12 organizations and 31 activities — SONORAN DESERT FALCONRY, WHITE MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE & NATURE CE, SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION, WILDLIFE CRITTER CARE and others. Activity concentrates in Arizona (100%). The field's most common shared approach is "Rehabilitation-to-Conservation", run by 7 orgs.
who to look at first

shortlist

Ranked by activity breadth, method diversity, and network reach across the slice. Attach a memo to this report and this list re-ranks around your intent.

where this slice is thin

gap signals

Concrete structural gaps — method mix, geographic concentration, coalition density, funder diversity. Evidence is cited from the slice's own numbers.

where the field lives · works

geography

Orange headquarters dots are sized by how many grantees are based in the state. Green circles mark real locations these orgs say they serve — from city-level populations in this slice's impact_map_populations data. Toggle layers at the bottom right.

regional breakdown · hq density
Arizona 100% · 12 orgs
who's here

organizations in this field · 12

sort by
direct service advocacy research capacity building
where the money comes from

funders already active in this field

Funders named as a funding source on these orgs' own materials. The count is the number of orgs in this slice that cite them — higher means a funder with demonstrable commitment to the field.

Arizona Game & Fish 1
Corporate
Arizona State Parks Heritage Fund 1
Government
how the field thinks

strategies in this slice

Theories of action extracted from the orgs in this slice. The count is how many orgs cite each one — a strategy run by many orgs in common is a through-line; one cited by a single org is still surfaced so the reader can gauge the full spread.

where strategy meets practice

strategies × activity types

How each shared strategy breaks down across the four activity types the orgs running it actually do.

direct service
advocacy
research
capacity building
Rehabilitation-to-Conservation
14
1
Experiential Connection
13
1
4
Collaborative Conservation Partnerships
3
Art and Music as Therapy
2
Community-Led Systems Change
2
Dignity-Centered Service
2
who works with whom

named partnerships · coalitions · networks

Entities these orgs explicitly call out as partners, coalition members, or networks. Unlike the strategy-sharing graph below (which is inferred from shared approaches), these are relationships the orgs claim on their own sites.

Amazon Partner
shared by 2 orgs
Arizona Game & Fish Partner
shared by 2 orgs
Arizona Science Center Partner
shared by 2 orgs
Liberty Wildlife Partner
shared by 2 orgs
Southwest Wildlife Conservation Center Partner
shared by 2 orgs
AT&T Partner
shared by 1 org
AZ Bat Rescue Partner
shared by 1 org
AZ Game & Fish Government
shared by 1 org
Act One Partner
shared by 1 org
Ak Chin Indian Community Partner
shared by 1 org
American Express Partner
shared by 1 org
American Legion Post 34 Partner
shared by 1 org
Animal Control Partner
shared by 1 org
Animal Defense League of Arizona Partner
shared by 1 org
Arizona Audubon Partner
shared by 1 org
Arizona Bird Conservation Initiative Partner
shared by 1 org
where the field connects

strategy-sharing network

Inferred from shared theories of action: each line connects an org to a strategy it runs. Organizations that share many strategies cluster through the same nodes — funders can spot the field's structural bridges.

scale of the field

rollup metrics

Aggregated scale claims from orgs in the slice. Treat as a floor, not a ceiling — many orgs don't publish these numbers, so totals underrepresent real reach. Extreme outliers (often unit-mismatches upstream) are filtered out.

300
Volunteers
from 2 orgs
26
Partner organizations
from 2 orgs